Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Danielle Garcia v. Charles Li, et al
as 16-17460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLE GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES LI, of Georgia Regional Hospital in his Official and individual capacity, R.L. (BUTCH) CONWAY, Gwinnett County Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity, KATHRYN M. SCHRADER, in her official and individual capacity and others
Garcia v. Li et al
as 1:2016cv03333
Plaintiff:
Danielle Garcia
Defendant:
Charles Li, R.L. Butch Conway, Kathryn Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Georgia Regional Hospital
as 1:2015cv04482
Petitioner:
Danielle Garcia
Respondent:
Georgia Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Daniel Garcia
as 15-12150
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL GARCIA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Daniel Garcia v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 14-13798
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Garcia v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00974
Plaintiff:
Jose Daniel Garcia
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garcia v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01241
Petitioner:
Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00420
Petitioner:
Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orozco v. Cleaning Masters of Florida, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60546
Plaintiff:
Carlos Orozco
Defendant:
Cleaning Masters of Florida, Inc. and Daniel Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Garcia-Martinez v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00691
Plaintiff:
Daniel Garcia-Martinez
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B. Clay, G. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
