Cases 41 - 50 of 519
Harmon v. Municipal of Cobb County, GA et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Randy Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Municipal of Cobb County, GA and Henry Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Augusta State Prison et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael David Williams
Defendant:
Augusta State Prison, Warden Forth, Deputy Warden Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Augusta State Prison et al
as 1:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
Michael David Williams
Defendant:
Augusta State Prison, Warden Forth, Deputy Warden Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07426
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARMON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kenyon J McCall
Defendant:
New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randy Harmon, Jr. v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Randy Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03763
Plaintiff:
KYLE HARMON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmon v. Fayette County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alfonso Harmon
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff Office, Fayette County Jail, Deputy Chief Anthony Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
HARMON H EASON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Harmon, III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13565
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES HARMON, III
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
