Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv81314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweepstakes Patent Company, LLC v. Mosley et al
as 0:2014cv62354
Plaintiff:
Sweepstakes Patent Company, LLC
Defendant:
Bobby Mosley, J. Michael Caldwell , Gateway Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Foley v. Greene Communications, Inc. et al (MAG2)(CONSENT)
as 3:2014cv00877
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Foley
Defendant:
Greene Communications, Inc. , R.M. Greene & Co., Inc. and Magnolia Greene, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Collins v. Nix et al
as 1:2014cv00674
Plaintiff:
Rodney Collins
Defendant:
Milton E. Nix, Jr., Garland R. Huat, Garfield Hammonds, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spina Marketing Services Inc v. McFadden et al
as 2:2014cv00330
Plaintiff:
Spina Marketing Services Inc
Defendant:
J. Michael McFadden , Michael G O'Mara and Meridian Energy Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SunTrust Bank v. AME Realty, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
SunTrust Bank
Defendant:
AME Realty, LLC, Sanford Miller, F. Raymond Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. City of Orlando et al
as 6:2013cv01124
Plaintiff:
Carl S. Johnson and Shelly C. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Orlando and Edward J. Michael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
J. Mastej v. HMA, et al
as 13-11859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. MICHAEL MASTEJ, ex. rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. and NAPLES HMA, LLC
Evester McDaniel v. Romel Cody, et al
as 12-15452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVESTER MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMEL CODY, BRAD MENDHEIM, DANIEL JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
