Cases 41 - 50 of 53
City of Gadsden v. 620 Turrentine Ave et al
as 4:2012cv01843
Defendant:
620 Turrentine Ave, Windell L Jolley and GMAC Mortgage LLC
Cross_claimant:
Windell L Jolley
Cross_defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Sanchez v. Jolley
as 5:2011cv00697
Plaintiff:
Roberto E. Sanchez
Defendant:
William M. Jolley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Midland Loan Services v. Jolley
as 6:2011cv01513
Plaintiff:
Midland Loan Services
Defendant:
Rodney V. Jolley
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Kirkland v. Peoples State Bank of Commerce et al
as 4:2011cv03246
Plaintiff:
Donna Jo Kirkland
Defendant:
Peoples State Bank of Commerce , Brenda Barnes , David Lee Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company v. Horizon Staffing LLC et al
as 1:2011cv21950
Plaintiff:
Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
Horizon Staffing LLC, Palmetto Brookview Operating LLC, Palmetto Hallmark Operating LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bracey v. Jolley
as 1:2010cv04064
Plaintiff:
Kimberly E. Bracey
Defendant:
Elizabeth A. Jolley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyre Watkins v. Tim Jolley, et al
as 10-14981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRE TAMMAR WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM JOLLEY, Judge, ROGER D. CENTERS, Lawyer, Marshall County Courthouse, MICHAEL DENNIS MASTIN, Lawyer, Marshall County Courthouse and others
Watkins v. Centers et al
as 4:2010cv02204
Plaintiff:
Tyre T Watkins
Defendant:
Michael Dennis Mastin, William Jetton, Tim Jolley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Jolley et al
as 4:2010cv02140
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Tim Jolley, Roger D. Centers, Michael Dennis Mastin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jolley v. Donovan
as 2:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
William B. Jolley
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
