Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Tooley v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
William R. Tooley
Defendant:
Jay Jones and Robert Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gladis Callwood v. Jay Jones, et al
as 16-17454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLADIS CALLWOOD, Administratrix of the estate of Khari Neville Illidge
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY JONES, CHARLES H. JENKINS, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Lee County Deputy Sheriff, STEVEN M. MILLS, individually and in his official capacity as Lee County Deputy Sheriff and others
Anderson v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00692
Plaintiff:
Carlton Anderson
Defendant:
Jay Jones and Middle District of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bartlett v. Jones (INMATE 2)
as 3:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Jake Bartlett
Defendant:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tewan Wilson v. Jay Jones, et al
as 15-13107
Petitioner - Appellant:
TEWAN WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAY JONES, Sheriff, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Hill v. Jones (INMATE 1)
as 3:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
Thomas Austin Hill
Defendant:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Auburn Police Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Auburn Police Department, Mayor City of Auburn, Chief of Auburn Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Warren, et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Milton Anderson
Defendant:
David Warren , Melvin Clark , Detective Kennebrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
Tewan Wilson
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Luther Strange, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Callwood v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Gladis Callwood
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Charles W. Jenkins, Jr., Steven M. Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
