Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Lewis-Rivers et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01339
Plaintiff:
Dianca Lewis-Rivers and Joseph Lee-Rivers
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35483
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34778
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEE ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32232
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEE KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32565
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOSEPH LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv31578
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEE FLORES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Musson v. United States of America
as 8:2019cv03102
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Musson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joseph MussonIn re: Joseph Musson
as 19-13751
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH LEE MUSSON
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Osbourne v. Hardy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00535
Defendant:
Mr. S. Hardy, Mr. Correctional Officer Hill and Mr. CO Womack
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Osbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORADO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01377
Plaintiff:
ARON FARMER, ANDREW DUTIL, CHRIS HAGEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
