Cases 41 - 50 of 11,475
Crosby v. Warden, Duval County Jail
as 8:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
James B.V. Crosby
Respondent:
Warden, Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dusty Bowman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11274
Plaintiff:
DUSTY L. BOWMAN
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MR RICHARD COMERFORD, Deputy Secty of Institutions, WAKULLA CI WARDEN and others
Benjamin Oryang v. Waugh, et al
as 24-11287
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant:
WAUGH, PERRYMAN, BELL and others
Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Donny Grammar
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wehner v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
Thomas Joseph Wehner, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coney v. Warden, Hillsborough County Jail
as 8:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Early Coney
Respondent:
Warden, Hillsborough County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chadwick v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Daniel Chadwick
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF
as 24-11280
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Miriam Tidwell v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 24-11228
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM TIDWELL, Administrator of the Estate of James O'Quinn, Deceased
Defendant:
JEFFERSON DUNN, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections in his offical and individual capacities, DEBORA TONEY, In her official and individual capacities, WARDEN, STATON CF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
