Cases 41 - 50 of 4,169
Woodruff v. Etowah County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
William Woodruff
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center, Fountain, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Cathy M Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Williams v. Mitchell et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Demericon Alex Williams
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. HUD and Prichard Housing Authority
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
William J. Mitchell
Defendant:
HUD and Prichard Housing Authority
First Horizon Bank v. HomeTown Lenders Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
First Horizon Bank
Defendant:
HomeTown Lenders Inc and William E Taylor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Williams v. Boulder Care
as 5:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Dana D Williams
Defendant:
Boulder Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Woodbrook Apartments
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Camillia Williams
Defendant:
Woodbrook Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams and Gladys Yvonne Smith
Defendant:
Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC, Piccadilly Holdings, LLC, Danny Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
