Cases 51 - 60 of 217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Neely v. Georgia Department of Human Resources
as 1:2017cv02980
Plaintiff:
Delores Neely
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-11080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marshall v. City of Prattville et al (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00857
Plaintiff:
Rosharee Marshall
Defendant:
City of Prattville, Autauga County Department of Human Resources and Nolan Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kayla Thomas, et al v. Nancy Buckner, et al
as 16-16142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAYLA THOMAS and JOAN RANEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY BUCKNER, in her personal capacity and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Human Resources and KIM MASHEGO, in her personal capacity and in her official capacity as Director of The Shelby County Department of Human Resources
:
SERVICE
Rory Scales v. Talladega County Department of, et al
as 16-15799
Petitioner - Appellant:
RORY O'NEAL SCALES, for A.L.S. A minor
Respondent - Appellee:
TALLADEGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, JUDGE RYAN RUMSEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Weakley v. Alabama Department of Human Resources
as 3:2016cv01383
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Weakley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johns v. Alabama Department of Human Resources (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Charles Kelvin Johns
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
