Cases 51 - 60 of 138
Randolph v. City of Baldwin Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00147
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ives v. Reddish et al
as 3:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Thompson, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Ives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. INCH et al
as 3:2019cv02068
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, RICHARDSON, JOHN DOE #0 and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS LEE BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC v. RIVKEES et al
as 4:2019cv00284
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, Christian Bax, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Del Favero Orchids, Inc. and LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borroto v. Lees et al
as 6:2019cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe 9, Peter Crank, Lees Eid and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Armas Borroto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allgood v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv21095
Defendant:
John Doe # 5, Sgt Moss, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Allgood, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. City of Baldwin, Georgia et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe #1, et al v. Miami-Dade County, et al
as 19-10254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE #4, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #6 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
KEATON v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00025
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, TARLOS THOMAS, TIMOTHY R NOLES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES KEATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation v. Select Social Media LLC
as 1:2018cv25326
Defendant:
Doe 1, Select Social Media LLC, Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
