Cases 51 - 60 of 196
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14260
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14296
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00045
Plaintiff:
Faibien A. Davis, Keith K. Smith and Chris E. Smith
Defendant:
Albert Bejar, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Wolfpack Delivery, Inc. and others
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06780
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porter et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 8:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Thurston Porter and Maria E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
SMITH v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC
as 3:2019cv01589
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Duval Detention Center
as 3:2019cv00444
Plaintiff:
Rufus E. Smith
Defendant:
Duval Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WOODRUFF
as 3:2019cv00022
Plaintiff:
SANDY E. SMITH
Defendant:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. KEMP et al
as 5:2019cv00074
Plaintiff:
YONAH EL and DAVEY JOYNER
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER THOMAS LEE, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, SOLICITOR GENERAL AMY E SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Saint Paul Travelers Company Inc.
as 1:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
