Cases 51 - 60 of 173
MCKENZIE v. JACKSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2019cv00492
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
DARYL LEMALE MCKENZIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAUFMAN v. JACKSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2019cv00463
Defendant:
KEITH BAILEY, JEETER, ROSENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE JAMES KAUFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eady, Jr. v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison, Butts County Commissioner, County of Butts and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Eady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inmates of Jackson County Jail K-Unit et al v. Mangum et al
as 2:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Sheriff Janis G. Mangum and Jackson County Jail
Plaintiff:
Douglas Chellein, William Moody, David Britt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RUSS v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al
as 5:2019cv00244
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, LARRY MOORE, TONY PUMPHREY and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON R RUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TUCKER v. JONES
as 3:2019cv01713
Defendant:
SANDLING SPEEDING, L PRESCOTT, GILEND SAENCES INC and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON COUNTY v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 4:2019cv00149
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
JACKSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Chandler v. Jackson County Jail
as 2:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail
Plaintiff:
Michael Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martz v. Unnamed
as 2:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Brian Martz
Defendant:
Unnamed, Janis J. Mangum, Jenni Arweed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
