Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Hinson v. Bias et al
as 3:2014cv01217
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reid Hinson
Defendant:
R. A. Bias, B. K. Kremler, S. T. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obertein et al v. Assured & Associates Personal Care of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00490
Plaintiff:
Jamie Obertein , Lynne Sheridan , Deborah M. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Assured & Associates Personal Care of Georgia, Inc. and Ruby C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Brooks v. Sears Roebuck & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brooks
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Company, Inc. and George M. Anderson Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes et al v. Grubbs et al
as 3:2013cv01329
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Eric M. Anderson
Defendant:
Grubbs, Shreck, U.C.I. Security Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Nealy et al
as 9:2013cv80125
Plaintiff:
Randal A. Ferguson
Defendant:
William Nealy, Herb, Steren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Anderson et al
as 2:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Robert M. Anderson and Unknown Tenants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Lester v. Anderson et al
as 6:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Lester
Defendant:
Lynn M. Anderson, Pope, John Staten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. GILO
as 5:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
RODNEY M ANDERSON
Defendant:
GILO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
