Cases 51 - 60 of 82
In re: William Taylor
as 15-10237
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM M. TAYLOR
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Lucas et al v. Acheson et al
as 2:2014cv02347
Plaintiff:
A. John Lucas , George M Taylor, III , Acheson 2000 Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Cameron E Acheson , David J. Acheson and Paige A Acheson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Taylor v Colvin
as 2:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Crystal M. Taylor
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2014cv00252
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
VERSIAH M TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Versiah Taylor v. Christopher Pekerol, et al
as 14-12446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERSIAH M. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER PEKEROL, IRS CI Agent, MARGARET WEISS, IRS CI Agent, ALFREDO VASQUEZ, IRS CI Agent and others
Johnson v. Cooke et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Harvey R. Johnson
Defendant:
Jason Cooke, Kenny Atkinson, Bryan Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucas et al v. Acheson et al
as 2:2014cv00856
Plaintiff:
A. John Lucas , George M Taylor, III and Thomas M. Acheson Revocable Trust, The
Defendant:
David J. Acheson and Sheree N. Acheson
Cross_claimant:
Sheree N. Acheson
Cross_defendant:
David J. Acheson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
James McConico, Jr. v. Cochran, et al
as 14-11949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COCHRAN, A Domestic Prossessional Corporation, JUSTIN M. TAYLOR, Attorney, JAMES W. PARKMAN, III, Attorney and others
Taylor v. Johnson
as 1:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor
Defendant:
Brian Eley Johnson and James K. Harred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Rubin Lublin, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Shawntelle M. Taylor
Defendant:
Rubin Lublin, LLC , Select Portfolio Servcing, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
