Cases 51 - 60 of 17,342
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Defendant:
John Hamm, Wendy Williams, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUGGANS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS DUGGANS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STEPHEN H SMITH and ELISA ZARATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60918
Plaintiff:
Raenell Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harris v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Byron Harris
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Smith and Kristian Wetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Pineda et al
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Victor Weldon Blake
Defendant:
Louis Caleb Pineda, Why Be Normal Pizza, Inc. doing business as Domino's Pizza and Charlotte Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Wilson v. Healthcare Providers et al
as 1:2024cv02377
Plaintiff:
Cortez D. Wilson, Salinas F. Smith and Salinas Acosta Weaver
Defendant:
Healthcare Providers, Emory Healthcare Service Mgmt., LLC and Emory Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Madelene Smith v. Ed Jeffords, et al
as 24-11788
Plaintiff:
MADELENE SMITH
Defendant:
ED JEFFORDS, RICHARD JOHNSON, DONNIE RAY and others
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
CHASMON DEON SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, TOMMY J SMITH, ALISON BURLESON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
