Cases 51 - 60 of 3,593
Wright v. Ernst & Young, LLP
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Quinton Wright
Defendant:
Ernst & Young, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Carrillo et al v. Nuerorehab Services LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Miguel Carrillo, Joe Cabrera and Kevin Mirelez
Defendant:
Nuerorehab Services LLC, Sanar Management LLC, Sanar Management LLC doing business as Nuero Rehab Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Britt v. Durham et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Chandler Durham, Turbo the Great, Warner-Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Young v. Holtzclaw et al
as 7:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alvis Young
Defendant:
Malcolm G Holtzclaw, Michael G Underwood and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Leodis R Young, III
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laquil-Lavet Robinson v. Shonna Young Gay
as 24-10251
Plaintiff:
LAQUIL-LAVET ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHONNA YOUNG GAY
Hyun et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2023cv05889
Plaintiff:
Bok Hee Hyun and Young Do You
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
