Cases 61 - 70 of 428
Ricky AtkinsIn re: Ricky Atkins
as 22-13148
Petitioner:
In re: RICKY JERMAINE ATKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ricky Atkins v. USA
as 22-13137
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY JERMAINE ATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anderson v. Whitfield et al
as 2:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Defendant:
Whitfield, Bryan Moore, Kenneth Noe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaulieu v. Powell et al
as 2:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Defendant:
Samuel Powell, Calera, City of, Calera Police Department, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkins v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv22114
Plaintiff:
Ricky Jermaine Atkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Atkins et al v. School Board of Seminole County, Florida et al
as 6:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
A. Atkins and A. Martin
Defendant:
School Board of Seminole County, Florida, AUE Staffing, Inc. and Derremy Jerrell Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIDLEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
ANITA ANN JACKSON WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, JAMES DAVIS ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07252
Plaintiff:
JACQUES ATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timothy Littlejohn v. Owens, et al
as 22-11423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE LITTLEJOHN
Defendant / Appellee:
COBB COUNTY SHERIFF, ANDERSON, REGISTRY and others
Sampson v. Black et al
as 6:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brent Sampson
Defendant:
Donna Black, Mike Kile, Norman Royale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
