Cases 61 - 70 of 136
Clyde Bergemann, Inc. v. Robocope, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02665
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bergemann, Inc.
Defendant:
Robocope, Inc. and Thanh Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baswell v. Rivord et al
as 1:2013cv02504
Plaintiff:
William Warren Baswell
Defendant:
Clyde Joseph Rivord and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ESTATE OF JAMES E POWELL et al
as 1:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ESTATE OF JAMES E POWELL, Irvin Clyde Powell, CLARK KENT POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 3:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Claimant:
CLYDE ARMORY INC and ANDREW CLYDE
Counter_claimant:
ANDREW CLYDE and CLYDE ARMORY INC
Counter_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Robinson et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 2:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Scelia Robinson and Zack Lyde
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Amity House, Jeffrey Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUDSON v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
CLYDE HUDSON
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, BRIAN OWENS and TONJA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Reese et al
as 1:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Darryl Carter
Defendant:
Clyde Reese, III and Keith Horton
Huskins v. Danforth et al
as 3:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Clyde R. Huskins
Defendant:
William Danforth, Diane Dees and FNU Lemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00296
Petitioner:
Michael Clyde Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
