Cases 61 - 70 of 3,416
Ray Scott v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13786
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAY EUGENE SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Boblitt v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02623
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Boblitt
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc. and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Lofton v. Kilgore
as 23-13684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL EUGENE LOFTON
Defendant / Appellee:
KILGORE
Minadeo v. State of Florida
as 9:2023cv81446
Plaintiff:
Jon Eugene Minadeo
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. JOHN DOES et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
EUGENE THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Deputy Sheriff VICTOR PURNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Cardenas et al
as 3:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Daniel William Cardenas, Mark R. Ambrose, Jr. and Lisa Haskins Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Makarowski et al
as 3:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Chyna-Michele Makarowski, Daniel William Cardenas and Heath L. Jakeway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02407
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
THOMAS v. PURNELL
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
EUGENE THOMAS
Defendant:
VICTOR PURNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
