Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 61 - 70 of 159
Pleasant v. Giles et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00685
Plaintiff: Polanski Pleasant
Defendant: J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Giles et al
as 5:2010cv02127
Petitioner: Kirk Lashia Jackson
Respondent: J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Giles et al (INMATE3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00630
Plaintiff: Fred K. Collins
Defendant: J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kasier v. Giles et al
as 5:2010cv01967
Petitioner: David Kasier
Respondent: J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. Giles et al
as 2:2010cv01866
Petitioner: Ulyesse Bryant
Respondent: J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Giles et al
as 2:2010cv01836
Petitioner: Fred White
Respondent: J. C. Giles and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Giles
as 7:2010cv01472
Petitioner: Silas Reed
Respondent: J C Giles and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hendrix v. Giles et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00454
Plaintiff: Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant: J. C. Giles and Lt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Giles et al
as 7:2010cv01070
Petitioner: Richard Earl Ward
Respondent: J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Giles We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01069
Petitioner: Carlos R Williams
Respondent: J C Giles and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?