Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Doe v. Avid Life Media Inc et al Featured Case
as 6:2015cv01464
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Avid Life Media Inc and Avid Dating Life Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe 1 et al v. Strange et al(JOINT ASSIGN) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00606
Plaintiff: John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 , John Doe 3 and others
Defendant: Luther Strange, III and John Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Dunn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff: Thomas Radford
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Doe
as 5:2015cv00391
Plaintiff: Danial Shannon Curry
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swann v. John Doe
as 5:2015cv00321
Plaintiff: William Harold Swann
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Samuels v. Demerin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv02106
Plaintiff: Ralston E Samuels
Defendant: Kevin Demerin and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff: John S. Leigh
Defendant: John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe et al v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2013cv01701
Plaintiff: John Doe , Jane Doe and James Doe
Defendant: Todd Entrekin , Victor Payne and James Craig Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Hoover City of et al
as 2:2013cv01232
Plaintiff: Homero Martinez, Jr
Defendant: Hoover City of, Graves, Andre Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Hoover City of et al
as 2:2013cv01233
Plaintiff: Laderrious Lamar McKinney
Defendant: Hoover City of, Graves, Andre Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?