Cases 61 - 70 of 403
Gary v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
James Edward Gary, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah Toney and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Pontes et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Nathan Leon Roberts
Defendant:
Joe Pontes, W. Green, Amy S. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. James Edwards, Jr.
as 22-10077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARDS, JR.
McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00808
Petitioner:
James Edward McKinnon, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FULWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60490
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD FULWOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LACASSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59448
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD LACASSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEMEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58649
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD LEMEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Burgos
as 2:2021cv00089
Petitioner:
James Edward Phillups and James Edward Phillips
Respondent:
Acting Warden Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ferguson v. Sanofi SA et al
as 9:2021cv81663
Plaintiff:
James Edward Ferguson and James Ferguson
Defendant:
Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44642
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD GREEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
