Cases 71 - 80 of 884
Perrong v. Rhed Key Properties LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Perrong
Defendant:
Rhed Key Properties LLC, Dodie Hagler and Nkemdirim Oti
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In re Amie Adelia Vague, et al (Panel: Judge Watkins, Judge Proctor, Judge Beaverstock)
as 2:2022mc03977
In Re:
Amie Adelia Vague, Jeffrey P. Doss, Melody H. Eagan and others
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kister v. Dr. Wilson et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Dr. Wilson and A Corporation Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nails v. Alabama, State of et al
as 7:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, State Employees Insurance Carrier, Andrew Hamlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duvall v. Andrew Jackson Baptise Way Church
as 5:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Duvall
Defendant:
Andrew Jackson Baptise Way Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kister v. Givens
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. D.R. Horton, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Michael Morton, Lisa Morton, Jeremy Smith and others
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc., D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham, Bethel Engineering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kister v. Willis et al
as 2:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Bruce A Willis and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
