Cases 71 - 80 of 426
Vreeland v. Jackson et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
Chad Vreeland
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Deputy Lowry, Captain Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burgess v. Turner et al
as 5:2021cv00920
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
Wells Turner, Martha Williams, Jeff Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Dennis
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Chief Deputy Lowry, Captain Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Captain Tuck, Chief Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00548
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Tracy Jackson and Captain Tuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Speaks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Keller Speaks, Randy Brown, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stackhouse v. Sewell et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Captain Howard, Morris Rogers, Lt. Sewell and others
Plaintiff:
Glen A. Stackhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashmore v. Lee County Dentention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Steward Hill, Lt. Jones, Lee County Dentention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Speaks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Captain Johnson, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
