Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Hammock v. Jolly et al
as 1:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Billy Nelson Hammock
Defendant:
Sheryl B. Jolly, Peter D. Johnson, Ann M. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Hammock v. Ann Vickery, et al
as 12-10166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY N. HAMMOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN M VICKERY, JOYCE GRIENER, Disability Rep, P. WILLIAMS and others
Vickery v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2011cv03910
Plaintiff:
Garrick Vickery
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Long-Lewis Ford of the Shoals, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. 1225 Village Terrace Court et al
as 1:2011cv03778
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1225 Village Terrace Court, 4455 Vickery Woods Court and 2502 Tails Creek Road
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Hammock v. Vickery et al
as 4:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
Ann M. Vickery, Joyce Griener, P Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickery v. Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
as 2:2011cv00114
Petitioner:
Wylie M. Vickery
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vickery v. Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services
as 3:2011cv00220
Petitioner:
Wylie M. Vickery
Respondent:
Secretary of the Department of Children and Family Services and State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vickery v. USA
as 3:2010cv90083
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James W. Vickery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vickery v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Wade Vickery
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
