Cases 81 - 90 of 18,481
Merritt v. Mathewson et al
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Larry Bernard Merritt
Defendant:
John Doe Mathewson, John Doe Morales, John Doe Scarpatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent:
M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Palm Bay Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Johnson
Defendant:
Palm Bay Police Department, Agent Tony Williams, Officer Breet Naymik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Blochowicz v. Steinberg et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Blochowicz
Defendant:
Jill E. Steinberg, Merrick B. Garland, The United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN MARIE WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC and CHRISTIAN EPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Randy T Jones and Wanda E Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
