Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Davis v. Brevard County Jail Complex et al
as 6:2008cv02160
Plaintiff:
John Lee Davis
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail Complex, Officer Medberry, C.O. I. Futch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Eising et al
as 6:2008cv02047
Plaintiff:
John Lee Davis
Defendant:
Officer S. Eising and Brevard County Sheriff's Jail Complex
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Brevard County Jail Complex, et al
as 6:2008cv02048
Plaintiff:
John Lee Davis
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail Complex, Sandra Esposito, Kristina Isbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lawson v. Donald et al
as 1:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Lawson
Defendant:
James Donald, Marty Allen, James Rigsby, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowler v. Donald et al
as 1:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
David Lee Fowler
Defendant:
James Donald, Fred Head, Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ochoa v. Donald, et al.
as 1:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
Romero Ochoa
Defendant:
James Donald, Marty Allen, James R. Rigsby, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00113
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv00057
Petitioner:
John Lee Mills
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Brevard County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2007cv01681
Plaintiff:
John Lee Davis
Defendant:
Brevard County Sheriff Department and Melbourne Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
