Cases 81 - 90 of 103
Carter v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2009cv00571
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Carter
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Dr. McFarland, Nurse Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2009cv00456
Plaintiff:
Tommy D. Burton
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Carry Torbert, Cory Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hindman v. Office of the U. S. Marshal of Atlanta et al
as 1:2008cv03562
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Doyle Hindman
Defendant:
Office of the U. S. Marshal of Atlanta, U. S. Federal Prison, Richard V. Mecum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Bank of America Corporation
as 4:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jay Jones, Jeffrey Jay Jones, Sandra D. Jones and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Avery v. Torbert et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
Walter Jamar Avery
Defendant:
Major Torbert and Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2008cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Roberts
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Officer Lyles, Sgt. Torbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2008cv00599
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Roberts
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Corinne Hurst and Tommy Magnaum
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Core v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2008cv00497
Plaintiff:
Christopher Leon Core
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Dr. McFarland, Nurse Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buckner v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2008cv00481
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Buckner
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Major Torbert, Sgt. Lyles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Love v. Stewart et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2008cv00350
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Deonta Love
Defendant:
Linda Stewart, Jay Jones, Corey Welch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
