Cases 81 - 90 of 1,257
Colbert v. Dunn
as 2:2021cv01709
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Colbert
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, Peters, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Ivey et al
as 5:2021cv01666
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Brown
Respondent:
Katherine Ivey, Jefferson Dunn, Errol Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sigers v. Dunn et al
as 1:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
Emmett Junior Stigers, III and Emmett Junior Sigers, III
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, R. Butler, Captain Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Dunn
as 1:2021cv00526
Plaintiff:
Dylan Hendricks
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn and John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Jefferson County Committee for Economic Opportunity
as 2:2021cv01609
Plaintiff:
Veronica Kemp and Laketra Wrenn
Defendant:
Jefferson County Committee for Economic Opportunity and Sharon Myles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrison v. Pettway et al
as 2:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Wayne Garrison
Defendant:
Mark Pettway, Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc and Jefferson County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Terry James Buchanon, II
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles, Lynn Head, Sarah C. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greer-El v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jerome Greer-El
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn, COI Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Dunn
as 1:2021cv00460
Petitioner:
George Martin
Respondent:
Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swope v. Episcopal Foundation of Jefferson County
as 2:2021cv01392
Plaintiff:
Nyesha Swope
Defendant:
Episcopal Foundation of Jefferson County doing business as St. Martin in the Pines
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
