Cases 81 - 90 of 719
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv80636
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Racine v. SunTrust Bank
as 9:2019cv80637
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank
Plaintiff:
Caroline D Racine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. $3,749,960.40 seized from TD Ameritrade Account No. 942304361 et al
as 3:2019cv00564
Defendant:
$42,000.00 seized from Sandy Spring Bank Account Number: 1678833001, $255,287.02 seized from UBS AG Account Number: UH-36477, $595,000.00 seized from Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JORDAN v. SUNTRUST BANK
as 5:2019cv00162
Plaintiff:
ANDRE PELE JORDAN
Defendant:
SUNTRUST BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Jaime Sanchez
as 19-11574
Not Classified By Court:
CIT GROUP, INC., FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, JPMORGAN CHASE & COMPANY and others
Petitioner:
In re: JAIME FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Stansell, et al v. Samark Jose Lopez Bello, et al
as 19-11415
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, MORGAN STANLEY, BB&T CORPORATION and others
Not Yet Classified:
200G PSA HOLDINGS LLC, YAKIMA TRADING CORPORATION, SAMARK JOSE LOPEZ BELLO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEITH STANSELL, MICHAEL JANIS, THOMAS HOWES and others
LR Trust v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01622
Defendant:
Donna S. Morea, William H. Rogers, Jr., David M. Ratcliffe and others
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
