Cases 1 - 10 of 5,619
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC v. Barrett Enterprises Rest. Inc
as 2:2024cv14194
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC
Defendant:
Barrett Enterprises Rest. Inc doing business as Kork
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Wheat, Loyd B. v. Denton
as 2:2024cv14192
Plaintiff:
Loyd Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
Nita Gail Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Jester
as 4:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Brandon Keith Bolden
Respondent:
T. Jester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. East Atlanta Cardiology, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02587
Plaintiff:
Brandon Smith
Defendant:
East Atlanta Cardiology, LLC and Muthayyah Srinivasan
WILLIAMS-VINSON v. MALEKI et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Daronte Williams-Vinson
Defendant:
Brandon Maleki, Jorge Guilarte Tunon, RUSSELL KOLAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Martinez et al v. ADG Innovations LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61014
Plaintiff:
Andres Felipe Martinez, Kurt Albert Pancham and Brandon Cordero Jimenez
Defendant:
ADG Innovations LLC and Amanda Delaney Glass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez et al v. ADG Innovations LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61015
Plaintiff:
Andres Felipe Martinez, Kurt Albert Pancham and Brandon Cordero Jimenez
Defendant:
ADG Innovations LLC and Amanda Delaney Glass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Capotosto et al v. Pettis et al
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Capotosto and Donnie Capotosto
Defendant:
Brandon Michael Pettis and M&M Farms & Feed, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
USA v. Brandon Oliver
as 24-11859
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRANDON DEVANTE OLIVER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
