Cases 1 - 10 of 25
USA v. Hermes Ortiz Alegria
as 24-11461
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HERMES ALBERTO ORTIZ ALEGRIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
GUEVARA-ALEGRIA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18745
Plaintiff:
HECTOR GUEVARA-ALEGRIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alegria v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00120
Petitioner:
Aureliano Banguera Alegria
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, FCI Safford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wagner v. Alegria Investments LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01059
Defendant:
Prince Tadros LLC, Alegria Investments LLC and Prince Tadros LLC doing business as Molly Hatchet's Sub Shop
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
ALEGRIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40923
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEGRIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEGRIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30708
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALEGRIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond James Financial Services Inc. v. Armijos et al
as 9:2019cv81692
Defendant:
Elsa Magdalena Calva Ulloa, Ana del Carmen Narv Chacon, Maria Gabriela Darquea and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond James Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Alegria v. United States Postal Service
as 9:2019cv81237
Plaintiff:
Susan Alegria
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
USA Engineering, Inc. v. Catlett et al
as 8:2019cv01578
Defendant:
George Prygocki, Christopher Lewis, Austin Catlett and others
Plaintiff:
USA Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
