Cases 1 - 10 of 8,579
Pacific Indemnity Company et al v. Ariston Thermo USA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company, William H. Nelson and Judy Q Nelson
Defendant:
Ariston Thermo USA LLC, Watts Water Technologies Inc, Tankpac INdustries CO LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
KHAYRALLAH v. RUTHERFORD
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
KOJO AL-ZUBAIR KHAYRALLAH
Defendant:
JOHN H RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KHAYRALLAH v. MAHON
as 4:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
KOJO AL-ZUBAIR KHAYRALLAH
Defendant:
MARK H MAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Selden v. Biden et al
as 8:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Selden
Defendant:
President Joseph Biden, Ashley Moody, Bennett H. Terryln and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SMITH v. COLEMAN COASTAL CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
JEANNE M SMITH
Defendant:
COLEMAN COASTAL CONSTRUCTION LLC doing business as COLEMAN RENOVATION AND REMODELING, COASTAL AFFAIRE LLC, MATTHEW F PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gomez v. Blessed Cars LLC et al
as 6:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Lina M. Gomez
Defendant:
Blessed Cars LLC and Edwin H. Silva
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Respondent:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
