Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Coleman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
William C. Coleman
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Tahir Siddiq, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34991
Plaintiff:
MALACHI C COLEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William ColemanIn re: William Coleman
as 20-11414
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM C. COLEMAN
Allen et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv25006
Plaintiff:
Barry Rushing, Cathy Tarver, Barney Rosemon and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
William Coleman v. Warden, et al
as 17-14905
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Adams et al v. International Paper Company et al
as 1:2017cv00105
Defendant:
International Paper Company, H.O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. and Bay Area Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adams, David K. Dock, Mary Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Coleman v. Warden, et al
as 15-10148
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Coleman v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv01345
Petitioner:
William C Coleman
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell et al v. Roadlink USA National, LLC
as 3:2008cv00516
Plaintiff:
Darryl Bell, Darryl Bell, Darryl Bell and others
Defendant:
Roadlink USA National, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dillard, et al. v. Crenshaw County, AL, et al
as 2:1985cv01332
Plaintiff:
John Dillard, et al.
Defendant:
Crenshaw County, Alabama, Ira Thompson Harbin, Jerry L. Register and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
