Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Knight v. C & P Towing and Transport, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61684
Plaintiff:
TODDRIC KNIGHT
Defendant:
C & P TOWING AND TRANSPORT, INC, ALEXDEINE GOODWIN and C & P Towing and Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
C & P Hansen Heating and Cooling, Inc. v. Hansen Air Pros, LLC
as 0:2022cv62445
Plaintiff:
C & P Hansen Heating and Cooling, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Hansen Air Pros, LLC
Defendant:
SETCHELL CHAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Corneli v. C & P Towing & Transport, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv61513
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CORNELI
Defendant:
C & P TOWING & TRANSPORT, INC. and ALEXDEINE GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
C.P.C. v. Raybon et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
WARDEN TERRY RAYBON, Steven T. Marshall and State Of Alabama
Plaintiff:
C. P. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C.P.C. v. Raybon et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00203
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Steven T. Marshall and Terry Raybon
Plaintiff:
C. P. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Britt et al v. GA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv04840
Plaintiff:
Inmates of G. D. C. P., et al and David Britt
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, GA Dept. of Corrections and Superior Courts of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G et al v. CARROLL
as 4:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
H G , M G , C P and others
Defendant:
MIKE CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stapleton v. Tampa Bay Surgery Center, Inc.
as 8:2017cv01540
Plaintiff:
Janie Stapleton , C. P. David Packen and Carmelo Alvarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tampa Bay Surgery Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal Jacobson v. CVS Caremark Corp., et al
as 16-16792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEAL M. JACOBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORP., C. P., Unknown Pharmacist and A. G., Unknown Pharmacist
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
