Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RT Bailey Construction, Inc. et al v. Towns at Skinner Mill LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
RT Bailey Construction, Inc. and House Plans, Inc.
Defendant:
Towns at Skinner Mill LLC, Veeral Lal Kinger, Monte C. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95097
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Badovinac et al v. Wyndham Destinations, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00649
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., Wyndham Destinations, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Badonivac, Michael Badonivac, John Colley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damali v. City of East Point, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00741
Plaintiff:
Tanner Damali
Defendant:
City of East Point, Georgia and Robert C. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Dillard et al v. Owl, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01967
Plaintiff:
Diane Dillard and Ulanda C. Gray
Defendant:
Owl, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
In re: Harold Gray
as 14-11709
Petitioner:
In re: HAROLD C. GRAY
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gray v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2013cv01385
Petitioner:
Harold C. Gray
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxwell Gray, Jr. v. CHS Prison Medical, et al
as 13-11902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXWELL C. GRAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHS PRISON MEDICAL, COLLEEN OAKES, Health Director and WILLIAM TALLY, Dr.
Buckman v. Morris et al
as 3:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Antonio Buckman
Defendant:
Ronnie Morris, Howard Carey, C. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
