Cases 1 - 10 of 25
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22255
Plaintiff:
CURTIS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: David Smith
as 23-12868
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID CURTIS SMITH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16039
Plaintiff:
CURTIS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11205
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CURTIS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12173
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith and Juanita Wilson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Smith v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07185
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CURTIS SMITH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94497
Plaintiff:
CURTIS SMITH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93069
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CURTIS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
