Cases 1 - 10 of 19
James Cuyler v. Charles Wilson, et al
as 24-11219
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. CUYLER
Defendant:
CHARLES R. WILSON, WILLIAM H. PRYOR, JR., ADALBERTO JORDAN and others
Cuyler v. Wilson et al
as 8:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
James M. Cuyler
Defendant:
Charles R. Wilson, William H. Pryor, Jr., Adalberto Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Bloom et al
as 0:2021cv60192
Defendant:
Judge Peter T. Fay, Jill Pryor, William Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmett Williams v. Clay Land, et al
as 20-11423
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKS TRUCKING COMPANY, INC. OF MEMPHIS, AUSTIN & SPARKS, PC, MARK D. LEFKOW and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMETT WILLIAMS
WILLIAMS v. LAND
as 4:2019cv00077
Defendant:
CLAY D LAND, BROOKS TRUCKING COMPANY INC OF MEMPHIS, Judge CHARLES R WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
EMMETT L WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dantes v. Honorable Charles R. WIlson
as 1:2018cv22887
Plaintiff:
Edmond Dantes
Defendant:
Honorable Charles R. WIlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lark v. Burney-Smith et al
as 1:2016cv04559
Plaintiff:
Andre P. Lark
Defendant:
Davina C. Burney-Smith, Gerald B. Tjoflat, Charles R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Burney-Smith et al
as 1:2016cv04558
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lee, Jr.
Defendant:
Davina C. Burney-Smith, Gerald B. Tjoflat, Charles R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. Burney-Smith et al
as 1:2016cv03883
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Jones, Leroy Lee, Jr. and Andre P. Lark
Defendant:
Davina C. Burney-Smith, Gerald B. Tjoflat, Charles R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. Olens et al
as 6:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Marquis B. West
Defendant:
Sam Olens, Thurbert E. Baker, Kathleen Pacious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
