Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hargrove v. Colbert County, Alabama et al
as 3:2018cv01382
Defendant:
Donald Kern, Frank Williamson, QCHC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Hargrove v. Warden, et al
as 13-13447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, BLAKLEY, Deputy Warden of Security and CARTER, CO Officer
Daniel Hargrove v. Toole
as 13-11462
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Respondent - Appellee:
TOOLE
Daniel Hargrove v. United States of America Corp., et al
as 12-15150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORP., SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Daniel Hargrove v. Warden, et al
as 12-14871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, LARRY HILL and GEORGE IVEY, Deputy Warden
Daniel Hargrove v. United States of America Corp., et al
as 12-12781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORP., U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE, SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
HARGROVE v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, WORTHY, HEATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGROVE v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant:
GLEN JOHNSON, TOMMY TRIMBLE, BELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Hargrove v. United States of America Corp., et al
as 12-10374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORP., SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Daniel Hargrove v. United States of America Corp., et al
as 12-10375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORP., STATE OF GEORGIA, U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
