Cases 1 - 10 of 2,254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ROSELLO v. S1 SECURITY GROUP INC et al
as 1:2024cv22272
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ROSELLO
Defendant:
S1 SECURITY GROUP INC and ROLANDO E. PALMA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cohen v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 9:2024cv80706
Plaintiff:
Glenn Scott Cohen
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
PALM v. CORRCARE INC et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PALM
Defendant:
CORRCARE INC, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Glenn et al
as 1:2024cv02422
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lewis
Defendant:
Gregory Glenn, Trans Line LLC doing business as TransLineLLC and National Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
King v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
Darrell Glenn King
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn v. ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Qiana Glenn
Defendant:
ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
