Cases 1 - 10 of 904
Gerald BrummellIn re: Gerald Brummell
as 24-11448
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD GUY BRUMMELL
Respondent:
ROMY LERNER, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)
Guy v. Burch
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Vernon Guy
Respondent:
Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duck et al v. PNC Bank
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Brandon Duck and The Estate of Tommy Guy Duck
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daniel Le Clerc, Sr. v. John Guy, et al
as 24-11047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LE CLERC, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN I. GUY and MARK R. MILLER
Bessent v. Desoto County Sherrif's Office et al
as 8:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Rashad Devon Bessent
Defendant:
Desoto County Sherrif's Office, Guy Flowers, Florida Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moeller v. Progressive American Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Scott Moeller
Defendant:
Progressive American Insurance Company
Other:
Stephen Guy Brannan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Guy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Gavin Washington Guy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Le Clerc v. Guy et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
John I. Guy and Mark R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
