Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Amerisure Insurance Company et al v. Amason & Associates Inc et al
as 7:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Amerisure Insurance Company and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amason & Associates Inc, Core Tuscaloosa 519-611 Red Drew LLC, Core Campus LLC d/b/a Core Spaces and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hill v. Logan et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Jr. and Ian Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Logan et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Justin Stanley, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryles v. Taylor et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Mike Loyless, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Lewis et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2020cv00236
Defendant:
Paul Weatherley, Steve Johnson, Ian Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Sheffield, City of et al
as 3:2016cv01485
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquette Myers
Defendant:
Sheffield, City of, Ian Sanford, Sheffield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hubbard v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00459
Plaintiff:
Ian Seth Hubbard
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Sanford
as 3:2013cv02140
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Byrd
Defendant:
Ian Sanford
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
