Cases 1 - 10 of 330
Neil Walker v. Michael Crespi, et al
as 22-13872
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEIL WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CRESPI, FRANCES H. SMITH, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Modrall v. William Barr, et al
as 21-10727
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF SESSIONS, WILLIAM BARR, JEFFERY ROSEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MODRALL and ROBERT GREGORY MODRALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Marquice Robinson v. AKAL Security, Inc., et al
as 20-12143
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, by and through Jeff Sessions, U.S. Attorney General and AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUICE D. ROBINSON
Duvercy v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 1:2020cv22069
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, John Kelly, Jeff Sessions and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Gardy Duvercy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GOLDING V. SESSIONS
as 4:2020mc00634
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions
Plaintiff:
Karim Tahir Golding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marquice Robinson v. AKAL Security, Inc., et al
as 20-11574
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, by and through Jeff Sessions, U. S. Attorney General and AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUICE ROBINSON and MARQUICE D. ROBINSON
Bey v. Givens et al
as 2:2020cv00472
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez-Guerere v. Sessions et al
as 1:2020cv20292
Plaintiff:
Johan Javier Hernandez-Guerere
Defendant:
Aldo Martin, Jeff Sessions and John Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
