Cases 1 - 10 of 9,809
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. K Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02470
Plaintiff:
Onike Smith
Defendant:
K Trucking LLC, Protective Insurance Company and Carlton Mitchelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Ramos v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Givani Ramos
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WASHINGTON v. SHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
GREGORY F WASHINGTON
Defendant:
K SHELL and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Michael McGuire, et al v. Attorney General, State of Alabama, et al
as 24-11731
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MCGUIRE, J E B and K L L
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SECRETARY OF THE ALABAMA LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Moura v. K Cabinetry Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Fabricio Alves Moura
Defendant:
K Cabinetry Inc., Hanuman Nandanampati, Fitim Kalanica and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PERNINI et al v. CIRCLE K STORES INC
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE PERNINI and RICHARD PERNINI
Defendant:
CIRCLE K STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
