Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keel v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Jontae Keel
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Richardson et al v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Rodrick L. Richardson, Charles Low, Walter Christian and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Superior Courts, Georgia Public Defender Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keels v. "5" John Doe -Officer et al
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Jasper Keels
Defendant:
5 John Doe -Officer and Jane Doe -Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeling v. Georgia State, Unofficial and Official Agencies
as 1:2021cv01730
Plaintiff:
Tenico Keeling
Defendant:
Georgia State, Unofficial and Official Agencies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeling v. Georgia State, Official and Unofficial Employees
as 1:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tenico Keeling
Defendant:
Georgia State, Official and Unofficial Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
