Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shakeyra Bradley v. Fulton County Board of Assessors, et al
as 26-12425
Plaintiff:
SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSORS, Kate Ingred, FULTON COUNTY TAX COMMISSIONER, FULTON COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE and others
Pugh v. Trump et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00539
Plaintiff:
Devin Brandis Pugh
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump and Kate Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loud v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00532
Plaintiff:
Zanterris Loud
Defendant:
Warden Headley and Kate Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEW v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04210
Plaintiff:
KATE M MCNEW
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Germaine Harris v. Ron DeSantis, et al
as 26-12047
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE D. HARRIS
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, BERNIE MCCABE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AYERS et al v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03724
Plaintiff:
KATE ELIZABETH AYERS and ROBERT AYERS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Koko v. Broton
as 7:2026cv00726
Petitioner:
Kate Egondu Koko
Respondent:
Jennifer Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kates v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2026cv00742
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kates
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Coleman v. Hail et al
as 1:2026cv01798
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Defendant:
Steve Hail, Kate Hail and Attorney/Agent's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
