Cases 1 - 10 of 537
Konan v. Saydah et al
as 6:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Raymond Konan
Defendant:
Neil A. Saydah and Saydah Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adams v. Holler Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Sherry Adams
Defendant:
Holler Law Firm, Najarian Capital, LLC, Scott K. Camp and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dwight II v. Calderon
as 8:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Dwight II
Defendant:
Liz E. Calderon, Judge Brenda Ramirez and Attorney Echemendia Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ofer v. Millan et al
as 1:2024cv20888
Plaintiff:
Raziel Ofer
Defendant:
Stephen T. Millan, Millan Law Firm PA, Roniel Rodriguez, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jackson v. BET Entertainment et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Defendant:
Stokes & Stokes Law Firm, BET Entertainment, Stokes & Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levine v. Kreiss et al
as 0:2023cv62080
Plaintiff:
Randy Craig Levine
Defendant:
Jason Kreiss and Kreiss Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Stewart v. Huntsville Police et al
as 5:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Tesheal Stewart
Defendant:
Huntsville Police, Madison County Sheriff, Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
