Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Charles RayIn re: Charles Ray
as 19-14712
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES MELVIN RAY
Ray v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv01574
Defendant:
Lt. Deaundra Johnson, Sgt. Samuel J Aaron and Warden Errol Pickens
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Melvin Everette
as 18-12730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MELVIN RAY EVERETTE
Ray v. Adams et al
as 2:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray
Defendant:
George Adams, Leon Bolling, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. HART et al
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
JAMES DENNIS REYNOLDS
Defendant:
DAVID HART, MELVIN RAY, ROSCOE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Davenport et al
as 2:2015cv01572
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Eric Evans, Gary Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv02148
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray Meyer and Carol Sue Meyer
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stollar v. Czarnowski Display Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04032
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray Stollar
Defendant:
Czarnowski Display Service, Inc. and Stewart Grant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cox et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02363
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray Cox , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2012md02329
Plaintiff:
J'Renee Dickson, D. Scott McIntosh, David Herold and others
Defendant:
Wright Medical Europe S.A., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Harlan C Amstutz, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
