Cases 1 - 10 of 53
BUTLER v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE INC et al
as 3:2023cv21251
Plaintiff:
Samantha Butler
Defendant:
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Michael Shane Moore, Randall Hobbs Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BURNETT v. MOORE
as 3:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
KODY K BURNETT
Respondent:
SHERIFF MICHAEL J MOORE and Warden ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Boeckman et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Blair Lanston Wright
Defendant:
Laura Boeckman, Fulvio Joseph Gentili, Robert R. Julian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. MOODY et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
BLAIR LANSTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY, FULVIO JOSEPH GENTILI, ROBERT R JULIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21008
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Moore
as 1:2021cv20708
Plaintiff:
Albert Williams
Defendant:
Judge Michael K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Awalt et al
as 3:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Duncan Montgomery, Brandon Podaras, William Awalt and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shunta Daugherty v. Harold Hurst
as 20-14028
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
HAROLD HURST
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHUNTA DAUGHERTY, individually, and as the administrator of the estate of Michael Dashawn Moore
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74109
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW MOORE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
