Cases 1 - 10 of 4,726
Mitchell v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Virgil Mitchell
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jamel et al
as 0:2024cv61731
Defendant:
Reka Jamel, Mitchell Jamel, P.A. and Alexandra Jamel, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mitchell Jamel
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Pico Romero v. Diaz et al
as 0:2024cv61714
Defendant:
Garrett Ripa, Mitchell Diaz, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Petitioner:
Yesica Pico Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mitchell v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Brandyn E Mitchell
Defendant:
J. Marshall, S Payne and FNU Gahrmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senker v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04123
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Mitchell Senker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00367
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heyward v. Savannah Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jamond Heyward
Defendant:
Janessa Stalter, Aaron Mitchell, Savannah Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Defendant:
GAHRMANN, S PAYNE and MASHALL
Plaintiff:
BRANDYN E MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01223
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mitchell v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv23407
Plaintiff:
Arlene Mitchell
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
